Quantcast
Home / Contributors / Carl Jackson / Did Trump Free Bergdahl?

Did Trump Free Bergdahl?

Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl should have been hanged for his desertion that led to severe injury and death for several soldiers that searched for him. As for the judge that essentially allowed him to walk free, his decision was a joke and undermined the credibility of the military’s judicial system. However, you’re lying to yourself if you don’t think President Trump’s tweets had no impact on the outcome of this case.

If you believe as I do, that former President Obama set race-relations back an entire generation by mere comments about Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr. (aka Skip Gates), is it really a stretch to believe Trump could have negatively affected the outcome of Bergdahl’s case? You may recall that in 2009 Obama infamously proclaimed that the “cops acted stupidly” when reacting to Cambridge, Massachusetts, police being called on his friend Skip Gates after he tried to break into his own home. Gates locked himself out of his house, a neighbor saw a man pushing the door open, but didn’t recognize that it was Gates himself. As any of us would do, the neighbor called the cops. It was a simple case of mistaken identity. No harm no foul, until professor Gates became belligerent with the cop that responded to the call and was subsequently arrested for disorderly conduct.

Mistakenly, President Obama, the most powerful man in the world at the time, stuck his foot in his mouth by commenting on the local police matter despite admitting “I don’t know all the facts.” After public backlash, Obama’s hissy-fit led to the awkward “beer summit.” I contend that the “cops acted stupidly” comment Obama made was the singular event that both heightened awareness and often exaggerated claims of police brutality. Secondly, it was those words that began a renewed hatred for cops in America within the black community that has led to multiple cop killings at the hands of blacks ever since.

The point is, like it or not, good or bad, when the president of the United States speaks, the entire world perks up their ears to pay attention. Their words carry weight and consequences powerful enough that they can affect everyone from the average Joe in America to our troops on the battlefields of the Middle East, from modern-day slaves in North Korea’s prison camps to Islamic terrorist plotting their next sinister attack on America.

There’s no doubt Trump’s “tell-it-like-it-is” campaign style won him the White House, but he’s governing now! He’s the president of all Americans, not just his base. There are times that his tweets and comments are duly effective. However, there are times when they’re not. He must learn the difference. Restraint is a president’s most important attribute. I’m not Mark Levin, but it is the difference between liberty and tyranny.

As conservatives, we’re quick to complain about judicial overreach, and rightfully so. Yet, we’re gung-ho when President Trump says something publicly that undermines the third branch of our government, such as our “justice system is a joke and a laughing stock.” If you believe that to be true, Mr. President, the answer isn’t to publicly undermine our institutions – leave that to commentators like myself. Your job is to preserve and restore (where possible) the original intent or the judicial branch.

As Andrew McCarthy of National Review, pointed out in his column over the weekend, “Your Sentencing Advice Isn’t Helpful, Mr. President,” there are over 300 Obama appointees on the federal bench. They’re salivating at the chance to dismiss any “pending” case that comes before them that President Trump has reacted to in his typical knee-jerk fashion.

To bring this full circle, that’s exactly what happened in the Bergdahl case, as McCarthy explained. Candidate Trump rightfully called Bowe Bergdahl a traitor on the campaign trail. Bergdahl’s defense argued their client could not get a fair trial in light of Trump’s comments. The judge dismissed the defense motion because Trump was a candidate and not the “commander authority” at the time. All of that changed after Trump became commander in chief. Immediately after commenting on Bergdahl’s case as president, the defense renewed its motion to dismiss charges based on now-President Trump’s comments.

The judge dismissed the motion for a second time, but “undoubtedly concerned that the president’s comments could result in a reversal on appeal if a stiff sentence were imposed, the judge sentenced Bergdahl to no jail time.”

Our reaction to Trump’s insatiable appetite to comment on pending federal cases should be met with loud and clear disapproval. Just imagine if you were headed to trial and he commented on your case. You wouldn’t be able to find a jury pool in the entire United States that wasn’t tainted. That does not strengthen our system! It’s also why I despise high-profile cases that are played out in the media with minimal information and high emotion. Despite one admitting “I don’t know all the facts,” whether a defendant is guilty or innocent is up to a jury to decide based upon incontrovertible evidence presented by the prosecution, or whether reasonable doubt has been established by the defense.

Sometimes all the president has to do to Make America Great Again is to remain silent.

Originally published at WND.com

CarlJacksonCarl Jackson is a radio talk show host – his web site is www.carljacksonshow.com. Media wishing to interview Carl Jackson, please contact media@wnd.com.

The views expressed in opinion articles are solely those of the author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by Black Community News.

Check Also

No, Colin Kaepernick Is No Muhammad Ali

GQ magazine named former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick its 2017 “Citizen of the Year.” In …

One comment

  1. Excellent analysis, Mr. Jackson. Keep up the fine work.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *