Get This: A ‘Pro-Life’ Woman Says Overturning Roe is DANGEROUS

In a deleted Twitter thread, Rachel Held Evans, who says she’s pro-life and a Christian, wrote that overturning Roe v. Wade would be dangerous. She said that a “significant percentage” of saved babies would live in “poor communities of color.”

And why, exactly, is this dangerous?

(FYI, abortion wouldn’t become illegal if the Supreme Court overturned Roe. Abortion “rights” would be a state matter.)

Pro-life and adoption advocate Ryan Bomberger, Chief Creative Officer and co-founder of The Radiance Foundation, has a huge message for Evans and others like her.

Check Also

Star Parker: The Biden Administration is Trying to Turn the US. Into a Marxist Utopia — Here’s What We Have to Do

The U.S. Department of Education included a group called the Abolitionist Teaching Network in a …


  1. There are people out there worse than her, and you can read their posts on any article dealing with abortion. They come right out and say we should be glad about abortion because the babies would turn out to be criminals, or we’d be paying Welfare for them all their lives
    What ever happened to “innocent until proven guilty”?
    We Pro-Life people know that everyone starts out with a clean slate and often point out the remarkable people who have made great contributions to society even though they came from poor beginnings. It always seems to be the Liberals, who claim to love certain people, who have such low opinions of those same people.
    Why do Libs insist we never question the motives of grown men sneaking into our country, or coming in unvetted by Liberal administrations, but our own babies must be crushed before they can “get into the country” and ruin our lives?