Harvard, Heritage, and ‘Pro-Choice’ Hostility

College campuses tend to reflect foreign nations with limited speech rights instead of the land of the free and home of the brave. The exchange of ideas has so many caveats and unspoken disclaimers that it’s easy to forget in a University that there’s a First Amendment.

Safe spaces have replaced robust discourse, sheltering too many from the non-monolithic marketplace of ideas.

Harvard’s motto used to be “Veritas Christo et Ecclesiae,” which translates into “Truth for Christ and the Church,” as the school was established to train missionaries. Today, it is simply “Veritas” or “Truth,” severed from the original Source, left to be subjective and ultimately (as we see with abortion) destructive. Knowing Truth is a constant pursuit, and it takes initiative. Seven years ago, when my amazing wife Bethany and I started The Radiance Foundation, I knew little about the historical, legal, socio-economic, and scientific aspects of abortion. I worked hard to learn, to weigh evidence, to come to reasoned conclusions about the human rights issue of our day.

I truly applaud the brand new Law Students for Life and the Black Law Students Association for creating an opportunity for Truth to be spoken on an Ivy League campus. (Sadly, we were prohibited by the “prochoice” professor from recording the event.)

They invited The Radiance Foundation to Harvard Law School to address abortion’s alarming disproportionate impact in the black community. Harvard Law Professor Diane Rosenfeld, who teaches courses on “Gender Violence, Law and Social Justice,” was invited to offer a pro-abortion view. Her focus is ironic, considering she supports the violence of abortion and Planned Parenthood which has repeatedly failed to report rape and was caught aiding and abetting sexual predators in Live Action’s undercover video exposé. I was born as a result of rape, so protecting the innocent is my passion.

It became immediately apparent, during Rosenfeld’s presentation, that she knew nothing about the topic. She had to have talking points given to her by the Harvard Law Students for Reproductive Justice the night before. She filled her time invoking buzzwords that define Women Studies programs (victim, bodily integrity, sexual coercion, gender violence) and sounded reminiscent of Margaret Sanger repeatedly emphasizing the eugenic belief that only “wanted” children are worthy of life.

It was surreal to hear the mocking laughter, jeers, and mistimed finger snapping throughout my brief 15 minute presentation. I shared my story of adoption, dispelled the myth of the “unwanted” child, talked about more black babies being aborted than born alive, and provided historical and statistical context to the issue. It was obvious the more vocal prochoice students didn’t want context; they wanted confusion. I asked, pointedly, how do we deal with the statistical truth that more black babies are aborted than born alive in New York City (1,180 aborted for every 1,000 born alive)? The responses, during an hour-long Q&A, came flooding out in macro-aggressive tirades that desperately avoided the central claim and theme of the forum.

I addressed poverty rates (9.65 percent among whites, 20.5 percent among blacks, 22.5 percent among Hispanics) and uninsured rates (12.7 percent among whites, 15.9 percent among blacks and 24.4 percent among Hispanics) and how it did not explain abortion rates up to six times higher among blacks than whites and often two to three times higher than Hispanics.

I dared to challenge the often empty rhetoric that #blacklivesmatter if time and place determine the value of human life. I affirmed that #whitelivesmatter and #brownlivesmatter because #humanlivesmatter.

The “bodily autonomy” defense was invoked numerous times, ignoring the fact that aborted human beings are never afforded any. One of the students angrily declared that, as a man, I would “never lose my bodily autonomy.” As a father, I lose my “bodily autonomy” every day. I lovingly sacrifice for my wife and children. I give of my body—just as mothers do—to provide, to nurture, to protect, to educate, to console, to play, to instruct, to do whatever I need to do no matter the physical cost to my perpetually exhausted body. Self-sacrifice is a far higher virtue than a narcissistic and unrealistic notion of bodily autonomy.

Professor Rosenfeld, at one point, began talking about the women’s suffrage movement and alluded to some unidentified photograph of a coalition of seven white men who allegedly opposed the suffragists. Rosenfeld and pro-abortion advocates, have no problem with seven white men in robes who ruled, in our nation’s Supreme Court, that one group of human beings (abortionists, who were mostly white men) could kill another group of human beings (the unborn).

I was laughed at when I suggested fatherlessness has a huge impact in the black community where 72.3 percent of children are born to unmarried mothers. When I praised single moms for doing all they can to raise their child(ren) yet were never meant to be both mother and father, the “reproductive justice” students scoffed.

Everything these activists were spouting were merely talking points from the pro-abortion group, SisterSong, which put us in their crosshairs the moment we launched our first TooManyAborted.com billboard campaign. The group tried for years, unsuccessfully, to deprive us of our First Amendment rights by demanding the outdoor billboard companies take down our billboards. They failed. Free speech prevailed. These “reproductive justice” students are being propagandized by a minority-led activist group funded by the world’s largest population control organization and population control chain—the Ford Foundation and Planned Parenthood. Oh, the irony. They were ferociously defending an institution birthed in eugenic racism and elitism that has become the number one killer of unarmed black lives (and white lives and every hue in between). Many of these Harvard “social justice warriors” are fighting for the billion-dollar oppressor and not the defenseless (and mutilated) oppressed.

But I am hopeful. Courageous students on campuses across the country, including Harvard Law School, are challenging the misinformed status quo. The Radiance Foundation is honored to help equip the millennial generation with powerful life-affirming tools that deliver the emotional and the evidential to illuminate the Truth that makes us all equal.

Ryan Bomberger is the Chief Creative Officer and co-founder of The Radiance Foundation. He is happily married to his best friend, Bethany, who also happens to be the Executive Director of Radiance. They are adoptive parents with four awesome munchkins. Ryan is a creative agitator and international public speaker who just loves illuminating that every human life has purpose.

The views expressed in opinion articles are solely those of the author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by Black Community News.