Baltimore Prosecutor Called Out For Hiding Something Big Regarding Freddie Gray

marilynmosby-913x512The Baltimore Sun recently reported a development in the Freddie Gray murder case that once again places state’s attorney Marilyn Mosby in the center of controversy. She has already faced criticism for making seemingly prejudiced statements supporting rioters who destroyed much of Baltimore after Gray died in police custody.

Mosby subsequently filed charges against six police officers present during Gray’s arrest, including one count of second-degree murder.

The latest reports indicate the controversial prosecutor recently filed a protective order ensuring Gray’s autopsy remains sealed to everyone outside of her office and the defendants’ attorneys.

The news sparked criticism among those who believe the medical reports could offer evidence contrary to Mosby’s account of events upon announcing the charges against the six cops. At that time, she declared Gray’s death to be a result of improper restraints and lack of appropriate medical attention by the officers involved.

Capture22

Ivan Bates, a lawyer representing one of the officers facing charges, shared his outrage over Mosby’s move.

“Mrs. Mosby is the one who did an announcement discussing what she said the evidence was in a nationally televised speech,” he said, “and now that it is time to turn over the evidence, to ask for a protective order is beyond disingenuous. It’s as if she wants to do everything to make sure our clients do not get a fair trial.”

As Western Journalism reported, it was with the release of his autopsy results that holes began appearing in the narrative weaved during the aftermath of suspect Michael Brown’s death last year in Ferguson, Mo.

Is Marilyn Mosby able to prosecute this case impartially? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

BCN editor’s note: This article first appeared at Western Journalism.

Check Also

Seventh Circuit Allows Indiana’s Law Barring Puberty Blockers and Harmful Procedures for Minors to Remain in Effect

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit upheld an …

4 comments

  1. We need an Edward Snowden here to spill the beans! Or someone with integrity to leak the info.

  2. She should recuse herself, at a minimum, as incompetent and, at worst, prejudicial! If this mess does not get a change of venue, let the “hangings begin.”

  3. She looks and behaves like a maniac. She is a crook.