David Mahan: Should Christians Use People’s ‘Preferred Pronouns’?

Should Christians use people’s preferred pronouns?

To begin, let’s put the usual talking points out on the table:

Yes, we need to desire heart change over managed morality. Yes, we want to have the opportunity to share the Gospel with people, as it is the power of God unto salvation. And yes, we should be gracious, because “as such were some of us.” However, simply making these statements does not necessarily mean that God will co-sign our corresponding approach to walking them out.

Yes, we are to minister through love, not hate, but does this mean we must bow to society’s politically correct definitions of love to do so? Is it really our Christian duty to affirm a lie in order to keep the door open to share the truth of the Gospel?

Then we will no longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the cunning and craftiness of people in their deceitful scheming. Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will grow to become in every respect the mature body of him who is the head, that is, Christ. – Ephesians 4:10-15

For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. – 1 Corinthians 1:1:18

Consider Jesus and the woman at the well (John 4). When He asked her to “go and get your husband and come back” before revealing Himself as the Living Water, she replied, “I have no husband.” How did Jesus respond to her false perception of herself? Did He tiptoe around her delusions so that He could share the more important revelation of who He was to her? Nope. He replied, “You have five husbands and the man you are with now is not your husband.”

Many Christians today would call such a response HATE. They would argue that because her sexual and marital issues are not as important as the Gospel message, we should ignore these issues so we don’t risk offending her and driving her away. Why? Because that is what our secular society dictates is the Politically Correct thing to do. For decades it has been seared into our conscience that Affirmation=Love and Healing, and Disagreement=Hate and Harm, despite what facts or even the Bible might have to say to the contrary. However, Jesus chose to deal honestly with the truth of where she was spiritually, as opposed to further perpetuating the lie she was living — in the name of truth. What was the result? Not only did she not get offended, but she ran back home to find others that Jesus could help: “Many of the Samaritans from that town believed in him because of the woman’s testimony, ‘He told me everything I ever did.'”

Could it be that we are so afraid of upsetting people’s corrupted perception of life and of themselves that we never give them an opportunity to be transformed by the very thing they are seeking: Truth? Galatians 5:11 tells us that the very message of the cross is inherently offensive.

To be even more specific, can truth and honesty coexist with love and compassion in the 21st century “Safe Space” church? For the woman Jesus ministered to at the well that day, it was the uncompromising truth communicated honestly in love that affirmed the fact that she was a sinner in desperate need of a Savior. Thankfully, the result was more than just a cool therapy session from someone who “really gets me,” but a Holy Spirit-led encounter that led to her salvation and the salvation of others.

Photo credit: Tim Evanson (Creative Commons) – Some rights reserved

Pastor David Mahan is the Founder of Frontline Youth Communications and a member of CURE’s Clergy Network. David is a national speaker, a youth development consultant, and a fierce advocate for youth and families both in the U.S. and abroad. Visit his site at DavidMahan.com

The views expressed in opinion articles are solely those of the author and are not necessarily either shared or endorsed by Black Community News.

Do you like this post? Subscribe to BCN’s newsletter for more!



Check Also

Joseph Parker: What is a Safe Abortion?

You shall not murder. — Exodus 20:13 Speak up for those who cannot speak for …

2 comments

  1. This whole thing is part of a plan to nudge us into denying truths we know, truths we can see with our own eyes, and erasing all those lines which we as individuals will not cross. They are telling us we must give up all our deepest convictions or else. How sad that this generation does as bidded because they are afraid of being called bigots or being ostracized, but will soon start teaching our children that they MUST compliment the Emperor on his new clothes out of fear of the child getting into trouble in school, or even the fear that we might lose our children to the authorities if we don’t. That’s where we are.

    The child that opened the eyes of all the adults in that fairytale would be in big trouble today.

    When I was a child, I saw a TV show wherein a panicked Black father spanked his child for drinking out of the Whites only fountain. How many people saw that and said, “If that were me, I never would have done that”?
    They didn’t understand the fear that this parent had on behalf of his child, who could have wound up in reform school or worse.

    Pretty soon, we all will know the same fear if we do nothing, and we aren’t even starting from the same point that the father in the story did. We let all this get so far because our fear was only a fear of being embarrassed.

    My “baby” is 39. What is YOUR baby being taught in school, this morning, about all this? Every day they can influence our children is a day lost in this battle. While we were worried about college kids being indoctrinated, it was spreading down to the earliest grades, right under our noses.

  2. Right you are, David. Often, people say things like, “You’re a Christian, so how can you condemn the LGBT lifestyle? Wasn’t Jesus all about love?” I reply, “Yes – tough love! He forgave them their sins – AND told them to sin no more.”